
On the Island of Jura, Scotland for most of year Nineteen Forty-Eight, one of the geniuses of the 20th century, George Orwell, wrote his masterwork. The novel "
Nineteen Eighty-Four" describes a "totalitatian dystopia"- or a scenario where the government has absolute control of a system in which people are living nightmarish existences. Part of its genius is the envisioning of the totalitarian communist state that would shape much of the later half of the century. Another equal accomplishment is in it's description of how peoples thinking, their culture and even their experience of consiousness could be controlled through changing language. In this grey landscape Orwell demonstrates
Newspeak- an adapted language to remove the the ability to conceptualize revolution, and lead people to what is called
doublethink- described as
"the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. ... To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies—all this is indispensably necessary."
1984Changes in the US cultural landscape in the last five or so years has shown a marked change of language. One of the saddest casualities is the bastardisation of "freedom". The encroachment of imperialism upon this high held value is sickening and the world will long pay the nausea. It is now unacceptable to the liberal mind that "freedom" is worth fighting for, that it is an inalienable right to rally around. Another is the "culture of life"- which is a rebranding of anti-abortionism, rather than say, finding out how we can limit the destruction of the species that form life. Hell, I would have settled for an old timey harvest-moon festival.
Scientists, like most of those guided by the light of reason, have not featured much on centre stage and mostly left this politico-cultural transformation. Until recently that is. Fundamentalists in the US have been trying to get some
doublethink happening around "Evolution". This pisses of scientists big time, as evolution is basically the underlying mechanism of genetics and broader biology. The attempt at
doublethink gets them going even more now they find they're being labelled, not as scientist but "evolutionary theorists". So whats the wrap? The argument runs a bit like this-
- Evolution. It's just a theory, right? The "Theory of Evolution"?
- This theory has some randomness in it right? (ie random selection, mutation etc etc)
- I have another theory. It is that stuff is hella complex, no ways a random theory could make such complex stuff.
- Thus my theory says there must be an intelligent designer of this complexity thats guiding the creation, not this random natural selection.
OK- old timey creationism vs evolution. By the by it's called "
the teleological argument", an argument for the existence of God based on supposed evidence of design in nature". Scientists all say "no ways" don't try and misuse science to justify your own assumptions about God, and so it has been argued out for well over two centuries. And also reasonably well buried as an "issue of faith". But what is interesting is in the current rehash of the argument, is it follows with
- Hey, these are both theories, right?
- As you scientists must agree, "Objectivity results from the use of the scientific method without philosophic or religious assumptions in seeking answers to the question?" (intelligentdesignnetwork)
- Then let's teach both these theories in school, nay, in Biology class. For the good of objectivity and... of the children who really are, the future of science.
At this time something special happens. Scientists Power Up. If they were transformers they would have formed a giant robot by now.
"Enough! You may question and misrepresent our most proven concepts, ignoring the fossil record and reams of genetic data, you may abuse the common understanding of the word "theory", you may snidely claim the objectivity to which we have devoted our discoveries ... but not in Biology class".
They are pissed. It's their Israel-Palestine and they're not letting go. This is not doublethink at the edge, in some relative environment of opinion and gossip. This is doublethink in the pure light of reason and experiment. This is the "denial of the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies" (
1984).
Well that give us the last of the three principles of the totallitarian government described in
Nineteen Eighty-Four. "IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH". And I think we are already familiar with the first, "WAR IS PEACE". Which leaves only "FREEDOM IS SLAVERY". And with so purchasing and electoral options, flavours and forms of entertainment, how could this be slavery?
"In Oceania at the present day, Science, in the old sense, has almost ceased to exist. In Newspeak there is no word for 'Science.' The empirical method of thought, on which all the scientific achievements of the past were founded, is opposed to the most fundamental principles of Ingsoc (the guiding philosophy)."
1984
For the lowdown on evolution from a real scientist try
Richard Dawkins, Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford.
Labels: Longer Posts, war